offer and acceptance under unidroit priciples case laws Can Be Fun For Anyone
offer and acceptance under unidroit priciples case laws Can Be Fun For Anyone
Blog Article
The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔
4. It has been noticed by this Court that there is often a delay of at some point from the registration of FIR which has not been explained because of the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness on the alleged prevalence and also the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of your petitioners continues to be tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened to get the real brothers of your deceased but they did not react at all on the confessional statements of your petitioners and calmly saw them leaving, one particular after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is no explanation concerning why her arrest was not effected after making from the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on lots of situations that extra judicial confession of an accused can be a weak kind of evidence which can be manoeuvred because of the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution is usually depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word as to presence of some light with the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners together on the motorcycle at 4.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
“Making certain the precision of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple reliable sources is essential for reliable legal research.”
The case addresses A variety of issues such as, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation with the right to life.
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually effectively-settled that while thinking about the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority must think about the merit of all of the qualified candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to such suitable candidates who are found to more info get most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed via the respondent department just to extend favor into the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part of the respondent department.
whether though granting promotion senior employees were regarded as for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based around the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more
This case has become cited in numerous subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional law, judicial independence, and also the rule of legislation.
Online access to a statewide search of adult criminal case information in the juvenile & domestic relations district courts, criminal and traffic case information in general district courts and select circuit courts. Note: Payments cannot be made using this system.
10. Without touching the merits from the case on the issue of yearly increases during the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision on the provincial government, this sort of once-a-year increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, needs further assessment to become made through the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a consequence of funding issues and lack of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
ninety . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally it is important to note that neither seniority nor promotion may be the vested right of the civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion may very well be claimed or granted without the actual size of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular length of service for turning out to be entitled to become regarded as for promotion to the higher quality, of course, is not without logic because the officer that's initially inducted to some particular post needs to serve within the said post to gain experience to hold the next higher post also to provide the public in a very befitting fashion.
14. Within the light from the position explained higher than, it is actually concluded that a civil servant contains a fundamental right to generally be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be regarded as for no fault of his personal and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency during the duration of service or inside the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Read more